View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Old July 11th 06, 01:41 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.equipment,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
Al Klein Al Klein is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default Email this to your Senators and Congressmen. make the FCC do the right thing.

On 10 Jul 2006 19:53:45 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:

Al Klein wrote:
On 10 Jul 2006 18:40:07 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:


but it is load of bullto say Morse is a language


Your opinion, not that of those who can converse in it.

my opinion yes but also a fact Morse code is no more a language than
Crillic is


Yes, I know your opinion. That still makes it just your opinion.

it is simply an alphabet


No more than ASL is "just an alphabet". (BTW, those who actually
study the subject consider both Morse and ASL to be languages.)

you can exchange a limited amount of info using the stand codes but you
can say "do you walk or run by the sea" in morse to any one that does
not speak or read english first


Neither can you communicate with someone in ASL if they don't
understand English. So? That still doesn't stop ASL from being a
language.

you are simply spreading ignorance al


That you don't know something doesn't make it the ignorance of others.

no such requirement exists indeed if you can read then the question and
answers are suposed to read to you and your aswers taken down


Languageless?


yes indeed although it easier if you do understand english not required


So if you don't understand English you can still answer English
questions. Interesting.

not suree if you can take the test in spanish


I'm sure - you can. But one thing's for sure - it has to be in SOME
language.

You MUST demonstrate proficiency in at least ONE
language to get a license, even today.


nope no such requirement exists not for techs not generals and not
extras either


Stop arguing and start thinking. Your claim - that one doesn't have
to know any language to pass the test - is nonsense.

indeed you point out the way you can get a license without demtating
skill with english if you simply memroize all the questions and answers


In what language?

their remains no requirement that you understand the content, that task
is easier if you know english but not a requirement


You can understand the content if you don't understand any language?
How?

where is this requirement for lang skill in part 97?


Part 97 itself.

A code test is demonstrating
proficiency in two languages - not a major step.


expect you are never required to demostrate profiicentcy in any
language at all


Which you are. You're just arguing, not thinking.

and if you were 2 languages would twice one and Code is NOT a langauage
just an alphabet


Again, your opinion, not the opinion of language experts.

Indeeded the ignorance of Hams that spread such tales have been one of
the tools the No Code movement has been using against you


The reason the FCC is dropping the code requirement has absolutely
nothing to do with any "movement" or any lame argument like "you don't
have to understand any language to pass the test".