Why does slow code hate the ARS I asuume it is becuase one of his other names is hey stupid
Al Klein wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:03:09 -0500, "CW"
wrote:
with all due respect to you as a fellow ham I strongly disagree with your
position. I got my ticket the so called "right" way. I've held an advanced
(WA4***) class since I had to drive to the nearest office for for the
written and cw.
Remember when the dam questions weren't even allowed to be published?
Remember those stupid ass ARRL study manuals?Al,how was that better?
Better? I don't know. Who said it was?
you did
But how many hams today could even understand a schematic, let alone
build a W2EWL rig?
how many need to
But how many SSB (or DSB) transmitters were
homebrew?
I have a hombrew AM unit a cute little thing built from the plan in th
last issue of CQ VHF's first run I will call it
Hams don't even build repeater controllers any longer -
everything is appliance.
so?
What's ham radio supposed to be (from the
government viewpoint) if not a training ground?
and it is
For people who know
how to operate. Not for CBers on ham bands.
People are afraid of losing things if we have too few hams?
indeed they are
Where
will the FCC's justification go (the "ham radio provides us with a
pool of experienced operators" thing) if ham radio is just CB on
different frequencies?
how is thatever going to happen?
why are you so afraid of CB?
|