an old freid to some a nightmare to people with small children wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:Will Someone But This Idiot a Spellchecker or Current
Webster's Dictionary?
an old freind abused the English Language Yet Again:

more libel

Nope.

More truth.

if abuse is occouring it is his

Nope....YOURS.

Every post to "alt.military.cap" is stalking and abuse.

nope

Yep.

it is a search for justice

"Justice" is delivered in a court room.

Your "efforts" are cheap intimidation which is only working to
make a fool out of you.

yes you are lying

Nope.

you contiue to lie robson notyou are like Wismen claiming all your foes
desire sex with you

And Morkie...YOU and Toiddie are the only one who's claimed to
have an overt interest in sex with men.

more of your lies

Nope.
yep

Facts.

you hardly seem to know the meaning of the word

I know them perfectly well.

Agreeing with you is NOT claiming you are "wise", fatboy.

more libel

How?

"Agreeing with you is not claiming you are "wise" is factual.

so

So your claim is invalid.

fat boy is libel

It's not libel when it's true.

You're male and grossly overweight.

Fatboy.

You're morbidly obese by all medical definitions.

more lies

Nope.

More facts.

No Lies = No Libel.

but you are lying

No, I am not.

OTOH if you think you are telling the truth then you admit you have no
legal case against me since to have one I would have had to injure you
in some fashion

that is how the game is played

Only your immature, childish mind thinks a "game" is being played,
Morkie.

you called it the Red Hatted Monkey game Maj

Who's Maj?

And I never called it a game, Morkie.

yes you did

Nope.

YOU did.

you playing a game the game is called how much harasment can be gotten
away with

What harrassment, CrossPostingBoy?

your harrassment

What harrassment?

you are the only one (besides your pawn Wismen) engaging in harrassment

What harrassment?

I have upped the stakes obviously not enough but I look for another way
to jump the stakes till you come to your senses and stop posting libel
about me on the NET

In other words you have herein publically admitted that you are
looking for ways to further lie and deceive in order to promote your
agenda.

nope

Yep.

you lied again

Nope.

Thanks for the admission. I'll save it for a rainy day...Like the
NEXT time you try to e-mail someone in CAP about your claims of abuse
and libel.

no admission

Yep...And I saved it to disc. Thanks again, fatboy.

you are obessed with the notion I want any contact with you

There's no obsession, Mork.

You keep initiating your own les and threats against me in this
public forum, ergo YOU are the obsessed one.

abolsutely no les about me

What's "abolsutely", Mork?

and no threats either

Huh?

my name is Mark

OK, Mork.

more libel

Nope.

yep libel

Not as long as you keep acting like Mork.

yu know that and choose to libel by calling me someting else

I call you "Mork" because you insist on acting like the fictional
TV alien...He arrives with a gross misunderstanding of the enviroment
around him, frequently misinterprets the words or actions of others,
then goes off on misguided antics in search of answers that any
English-competent 3rd grader already knows the answers to.

you call me mork to insult me

You act like Mork ergo you insult yourself.

nope

more libel

Nope.

and then you tell more lies about me

"...more lies.." suggests previous lies.

not merely suggests

You're right...It also libels.

So since you are so sensitive to "libel" at every turn, WHY ARE YOU
DOING IT...?!?!

There are no lies.

sure they are a legion of your lies

More misuse of the English language, Mork.

You lose.

I can't lose Robeson

Of course you can't lose Robeson, Mork.

right agred I can't lose

That's not what you wrote, fatboy.

yes it is what I wrote

Nope.

yes it is what I wrote

YOU wrote "I can't lose Robeson"...

right

and I can't lose robeson

You can't lose what you didn't have, Mork.

And once again (for the 7th time today) you insist on abusing
yourself with the sanme stupid mistake!

THAT sentence suggests that you are incapable of misplacing a
Robeson.

and it is certainly true even in that distorted context as you prove

Nope.

Had you written "I can't lose, Robeson.", you would have been
telling somone named Robeson that you were incapable of losing.

I am incaaple of losing or of losing you it seems

What you're incapable of is making sense.

short of murder of course

Here we go with YOU making refrence to violence again.

After you insisted you don't do it.

Liar liar pants on fire.

and I repeat I can't lose

You can't repeat it since that's not what you said in the first
place.

sure I have siad manytime many ways

You've LIED many times and in many ways.

The foregoing being part and parcel thereof.

Steve, K4YZ