View Single Post
  #57   Report Post  
Old July 23rd 06, 03:33 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Reg Edwards Reg Edwards is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 167
Default Length & number of radials


"H. Adam Stevens, NQ5H" wrote
I'm often confronted with problems as a physicist where one can only

get a
handle on upper and lower bounds.
Lower bound:
I'd say the minimum number and length of radials is 3 (must define a

plane)
and 1/4 wavelength (satisfies boundary conditions).

Upper (infinite sheet of copper)
As Walt and Reg have debated, the "Cleese extreme" (to steal from

Reg's
post) is trying to duplicate the "infinite perfectly conducting

plane" of
our elementary physics books.
Cheers and beers


==========================================

Yes Adam, a logical way of looking at it.

Associated with any number there is always another number which is
sometimes, but not often enough, used to describe its uncertainty.

But nearly always it takes much longer to determine the uncertainty
than it does to arrive at the first number, especially if the first
number is the result of a measurement.
----
Reg.