David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', since c.2000 wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
s.com...

David Eduardo wrote:

Huh? We are trying to preserve the value of tens of billions of dollars
worth of AM stations by keeping them viable for longer.

The truth is more along the lines of "We are trying to make a quick
buck while the opportunity still exists."

There is no way to make a quick buck in radio. If you know how, please
illuminate us. Otherwise, do what you keep telling me to do: stuff it. Your
defense for soing nothing is based on a total lack of facts, no alternate
plan, no alternatives. You just criticize what is being done, yet have no
suggestions... just invective.

This is how AM radio in the Western Hemisphere and, probably, Asia is
going
to be. If you think reality is in disagreement with your interests, don't
blame me. Go see a psychiatrist.

If you're right, then the decline of AM will go from rapid to greased
lightning.

Since HD does not interfere with existing AM listening in analog, try
explaining this one, too.

Sure it does, Edweenie! It DESTROYS the two adjacent channels, you blubbering
nitwit!

dxAce
Michigan
USA