David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
ups.com...

Nope. Only in your mind. There was an error in the way my postion was
listed
by the NAB for the 2004 San Diego convention, and nobody really cared
except
you and dxAss.

Can't you hear how ridiculous that sounds? You're too old for this
nonsense, whoever you are.

It is ridiculous that you don't recognize it for what it is, a simple
mistake. I can point out spelling errors and mistakes in nearly every NAB
program... when they do a convention for tens of thousands of people, there
will be a coupple of gaffs.

All I can say is, you must have a thick skin to stand up and humiliate
yourself like this in front of the readers of this group.


Oh, sure. I'm going to be on a panel with the programming heads of 5 of
the
10 largest broadcasters in the US in front of about 2500 persons who are
also broadcasters and nobody is going to know?

I'm sure a lot of those people didn't know who you were.

Most of them did. They read Inside Radio, they read Radio Ink (#2 Major
Market PD of the Year a few years back in their industry poll) and RBR and
R&R and so on.

Uh huh....so you say....


Tell you what: Call Tom Tyler, editor of Inside Radio, and ask him. Or call
Owen Charlebois, President of Arbitron. Or Mark Mays or Randall Mays of
Clear Channel. Ask any of them. Go ahead.


The question is, if I didn't call a few people whom you have hand
picked, what would they say? Don't treat me like a fool. This is the
oldest, most transparent trick in the book.




Look, your trolling is a minor nuisance, but when you push things too
far and get caught, at least have the balls to fess up.

To what? Having a name? To the NAB making a small mistake?


Having a name is fine. It's lying about your name that's not cool.

Never did. I use several variants, with and without middle name and second
given name, as do most people. William Ferdinad Barkley, III is Bill to
friends, William F. Barkley on his busines card, and the full thing on legal
papers. All depends on the venue. Same name, differnt extensions.

Yes, it all depends on the venue. If it's a venue you wish to lie in,
then you use one name. If it's a venue you wish to tell the truth in,
then you use another.



If you wanted to verify, you could. But it is a lot more fun to have
someone
to attack because you disagree with them, and ad hominems are a lot
easier
to launch than a factual approach.

Apparently it's a lot more fun to go 'fibbing' on the internet and
lying about your true identify. Though I must say, it's hard for me to
see the fun in it, especially for an adult man.

Yet you could verify this all... I even gave you names... but you won't. It
is more fun to be in denial, and use your lies to try to invalidate the
point that HD is here, like it or not.

It's far, far too late for you to attempt to implement this kind of
damage control. You've been caught too many times for this to work.
It's like putting a bandaid on decapitation.