You can do about it what you like. What I've chosen to do about it is to
try and educate the people who will listen, and ignore those who won't.
I find the concepts perfectly understandable without the need for
additional adjectives.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

W5DXP wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:

What needs to be thrown away is the belief that all impedances are the
ratio of a voltage to a current, along with the notion that only
resistors can have resistance.


I agree, Roy, but what can we do about it? I had been using "virtual
impedance" to differentiate a voltage to current ratio from an intrinsic
physical impedance. How would you differentiate an intrinsic physical
impedance from a voltage to current ratio?
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP