Thread: Receiving Loop
View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 12th 06, 10:59 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
K7ITM K7ITM is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 644
Default Receiving Loop

You can find quite a bit of discussion about small loops if you search
the archives of this group. That, however, may confuse you because
some folk seem intent on making absolute statements about things they
don't really understand. Reputable books will tell you that the
"shield" is actually the antenna, and to gain the advantage of
rejection of local predominantly e-field noise, you must make the loop
very symmetrical. I know that Jasick's Antenna Engineering book has a
good chapter on loops, and King, Mimno and Wing's "Transmission Lines,
Antennas and Waveguides" has a good qualitative discussion of them.
There are various programs out there to help you determine the
performance of small receiving loops. I've found one on Reg Edwards'
web page to be useful.

Cheers,
Tom

John wrote:
Hello all,

I am new to the group and have a question.

Does anyone know a good source of information on small (less than
.1wl), shielded (coax) magnetic loops? In particular, I would like to
know design equations (are ON4UN's formulae correct and complete?). Why
do most people use RG-59 rather than a thicker coax (shielding, C/ft?)?
Why is 20' for 160 meters the norm? Discarding mechanical
considerations, wouldn't thicker coax provide greater efficiency?

I found ON4UN's book lacking on this antenna.

Thanks in advance,
John, N9RF