an old friend wrote:

nope I refering to charge he interfered with passing emgency ham
traffic out of Mexico city after a quake


Didn't see that in the NAL.. Didn't that happen years ago? (Trying to
sweep off the dust on the Mexico City Quake..) If so, it is not what
the NAL was charging him with.

They are dealing only with the offences on Nov 27, 2004; Dec 3, 2004;
and March 31, 2005 which where directly observed by FCC agents.

-= Bob =-