On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:43:31 -0700, the messenjah wrote:
K. A. Cannon wrote:
On 11 Aug 2006 15:33:00 -0700, wrote:
Kevin - I don't think you've thought this through. I'm not a fan of
Chuck's. But I assume you realize that you'll have to testify, assuming
the matter goes to trial. Which means that you'll be cross-examined by
defense counsel. Which *means* that all of *your* Usenet & Internet
activities as it relates to Chuck and 'kooks' and AUK will be open to
scrutiny. Are you prepared for that? Are you prepared to no longer
discuss it if the jury acquits him?
Dear AOL'er....
How does anything I have done on UseNet have anything to do with Lysaght
making harassing phone calls to multiple people in multiple states?
Please understand how the law works.
You are sooooo ****ing pathetic, Cannon. You're a pussy.
You're the one who makes threatening and harassing phone calls to people
he doesn't really know, Chuckie, then fails to follow through on said
threats. I think it's perfectly obvious who's "pathetic".
--
__________________________________________________ ________________________
Hail Eris!
Not Richard Scoville
Richard M. Scoville is explicitly denied the right to archive any of my
posts, under any of my nyms, on his site, FreeSpeechStore.com
http://tinyurl.com/c222n