Ha... yeah, only a ham radio operator would use a non-digital camera.....
and then it would have to be a daguerreotype.
rb
"Brian Denley" wrote in message
...
an old friend wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
(Fred McKenzie) wrote in
:
In article , "Alun L.
Palmer" wrote:
"If you came upon a drowning man, and you had to choose whether to
save him or photograph his demise, what kind of film would you use?"
Getting rid of CW is like choosing the kind of film.
Ham radio is drowning and the anti-code hams want us to think
tossing it bricks will make it float better. Dumbing things down is
never an improvement.
nobody is talking about dummbing anything down
you are
indeed you advocate dummbing down radio and giving hf only to the
unintelgent
SC
Knowing CW is NO indication of any level of intelligence, technical or
otherwise!
BTW film is seeing it's last days too. Ask Kodak!
--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html