Telamon wrote:
If you had a soul or a conscience you would drop rec.radio.shortwave off
the news group header since this is off topic crap.
Plonk
Plonk-B-Gone wrote:
If -YOU- had a conscience (or half a brain), you would realize that you
are being a pompous, hypocritical jackass, condemning others for
-exactly- what you have done over 300 times.
Your Pal,
Plonk
Same clueless idiot, different handle.
Plonk
Now a little refresher from a few months ago:
Telamon wrote:
I for one would appreciate it if the political nut cases would stick to
the off topic flame threads or start their own thread.
Whatever wrote:
Time for some irony and hypocrisy. Just a small sample.
http://tinyurl.com/pz8do
"Carter, K8VT" wrote:
Very interesting...320 posts, almost all of them political per se, not
complaints about OT posts. (Sorry, didn't have time to read all 320, but
the ones I did read *clearly* demonstrated the irony).
I think "hypocrisy" defines our boy up on his high horse quite well. Yet
another example of "Do as I say, not as I do".
Telamon wrote:
You and whatever have a high number of off posts. You and whatever
generally do not post helpful replies to questions. You and whatever can
point back to a period of time during a contentious election and that's
it for me but you and whatever are a different story. Do continue
looking like a clueless jackass as you do in most of your posts.
Carter, K8VT wrote:
As you *still* don't get it, *you* appear to be the "clueless jackass".
Telamon wrote:
I'm not a hypocrite. I contribute a lot of on topic and helpful posts to
this news group and I don't feel the need to justify my posting history
to someone with your poor posting history. Your recent AND long time
posting history is most off topic political posts. This is the only post
in two days so it is clear to me that you just want to ague and
denigrate me so into the kill file with you.
Plonk
Carter, K8VT wrote:
First, sorry to drag this thread on, but you still don't seem to get it.
Next, maybe you do need to justify your posting history as this is
really at the heart of the debate...
* you accused and chastised me (and others) of a "high number" of OT posts.
* 'Whatever' called your bluff, did some research and caught *you* with
your pants down--*320* OT posts (while I have of 146 posts total, maybe
100 OT). That would seem to make *you* the winner of the "High Number"
award, not others. Sort of like a guy with 320 traffic tickets calling a
guy with 100 tickets a bad driver.
* When you accuse people of doing something wrong and then it comes to
pass that *you* have done the same "wrong" thing almost *three* times as
often, then, yes, you *should* justify your posting history or be
exposed for the hypocrite you are.
As to your trying to justify your 320 OTs because you post on topic
also--well, that's a little like a bank robber saying it's OK to rob
banks because he gives some of the money to charity. NOT! OT is OT and
your 320 trumps my 100. Period [.]
Telamon wrote:
so into the kill file with you.
Plonk
Carter wrote:
Thought I was already there(!) but, please, do so again. It's getting
too hard to follow your illogic, denials, dodging, weaseling and bogus
"justification" of *YOUR* 320 OTs.