Cecil Moore wrote:

[snip]

Steady-state had a beginning and it will have an end. It
cannot be analyzed without knowing what happened in the
beginning and what will happen in the end. Steady-state
is the rug under which you and others try to sweep the
laws of physics including the conservation of energy
principle. I'm doing what I can to call your bluff.

Cecil,

Countless mathematicians and scientists would disagree with your
characterization of steady state. Perhaps even a few engineers as well. 8-)

This sort of stuff is thoroughly covered in differential equations
courses and in any physics or engineering course that look at electrical
or mechanical response to impulses and other stimuli. Surely they dealt
with such matters at TAMU.

If you refuse to accept standard technical conventions, then there is
little hope of getting others to agree with you.

73,
Gene
W4SZ