View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old August 31st 06, 04:43 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
SeeingEyeDog SeeingEyeDog is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 64
Default Who's been running the show since the Katrina disaster?

For a long time now we've been listening to the Democrats and their toadies
in the media complaining about the Bush administration's handling of the
Hurricane Katrina disaster and its aftermath.

They charge it up to what they call the administration's incompetence,
implying that had the Democrats been running the show, things would have
been handled much better.

It takes a lot of gall to make that charge because as one Town Hall blogger,
Cato's Corner, recently pointed out, the Democrats were in charge before,
during and ever since Katrina hit the Gulf Coast.

In the United States, the authorities at the state and local levels are
responsible for what happens in their areas. In Louisiana the governor is a
Democrat, and the mayor of New Orleans is a Democrat. They were the
so-called first responders, and their response was pitiful. They can blame
President Bush all they want, but it was their job to handle the disaster
and their handling of it was a disaster in itself.

That incompetence continues, especially in New Orleans where the cleanup and
rebuilding efforts are lagging far behind where they would have been had
they done their jobs competently. And they can't blame that on the president
or the federal government.

The fact is that $11.8 billion has been allocated. That's everything that
New Orleans asked for. They got $6 billion in December, another $4 billion
in May, another $1.8 billion recently, and yet they haven't spent the money.

One big problem: New Orleans has yet to come up with a master plan that will
allow people to know what they can do and how to do it.

"The citizens of New Orleans need to know what the plans are, so the
citizens can make their plans on whether they should rebuild, repair or sell
their homes," Norman Francis, chairman of the Louisiana Recovery Authority,
which oversees federal aid given to Louisiana told the Seattle
Post-Intelligencer.

"A lot of people are holding their money back pending an affirmation that
the city really has a broader idea of where it's going in the future. What
kind of a city is it going to be?" added Ken Topping, a California planning
consultant hired to help.

Moreover, the city refuses to relax the red-tape provisions to allow the
people to get the money to be able to rebuild, which is exactly the opposite
of what Mississippi's Republican Governor Haley Barbour has done in his
state. He cut through the red tape to allow the people to get the funds
necessary to go ahead and rebuild.

Another reason is that the folks in Mississippi are working together, not
standing around waiting for the federal government to rebuild. Officials in
Louisiana are still whining, waiting for somebody to do everything for them.

The federal government has supplied the funds. It is the local government
that refuses to distribute the money. I was talking to a member of Congress
from Louisiana who recalled that the Congress had authorized $6 billion last
December but New Orleans made the determination that they were not going to
spend any of it until they got the whole $10 billion they were then
demanding.

In Mississippi, on the other hand, as they were getting the money they were
finding ways to spend it to help the people rebuild.

Tragically, the President is playing into the hands of his critics by
implying that he is somehow to blame for the situation. He's allowing the
Democrats to use him as fodder in their attacks on him. He needs to stand up
and shout, "We're not to blame. We gave you the money. If the people in New
Orleans don't have the money it's not because the federal government hasn't
done its job; it's because your local government officials refuse to do
theirs."

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=24146