On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 22:49:12 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
With Jim's lackadaisical approach to conservation of
energy, there is no "correct" answer.

A long winded answer for you don't know.

Only a fool would venture an answer under the boundary
conditions defined by Jim.

a lackadaisical 14 word apology replacing a 3 word admission of not
knowing - and across two postings. No doubt this will be followed by:
1. more lackadaisical postings;
2. more lackadaisical words;
3. no answer.

It's curious that you haven't denied that 100 Joules is NOT the right
answer! At least Jim went that far, if no further. In a two man race
you have managed to put yourself in third place.