Cecil Moore wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote:

The effect of Differing amounts of CO2 on atmospheric thermal
retention has been a well documented fact since the 1840's.


Yes, and the 11 year sunspot cycle has been a well documented
fact for thousands of years. Does puny man have any more
control over the 100K year CO2 cycle than he does over the
11 year sunspot cycle.

You have time scales a tad messed up. WE don't have any control over
the log period cycles.



Methinks you (and others) suffer
from delusions of grandeur. Why do you think the CO2 levels
*ALWAYS* drop after they reach ~280 ppmv? Do you think man
can do anything to block that ~100k year drop in CO2 levels?

Cecil, you are making arguments as if I am some kind of dyed in the
wool tree huggin hippie back to the cave days left wingin' democratic
commie leebural.

And yet you haven't provided one single non-political (and not
scientifically flawed) oriented debunking of the CO2 effect upon the
atmosphere.

No delusions Cecil. I await enlightenment. You argue in the same vein
as creationists. If you wanna have an intelligent argument, fine. If
not, fine.

Tell me why the CO2 levels *ALWAYS* drop after reaching 280 ppmv. I
await. Otherwise, I'll allow you to have the last word, and continue on
your way. Science isn't a debate, despite what creationists, Anne
Coulter, and creationists think. It is how things are.

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -