On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:43:39 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
Chapter 3. Fig. 3-1 "Complete transmission line circuits"

Been there, done that. It doesn't resemble anything you have said.

Chapter 3. Fig. 3-2 "Equivalent circuits"

Been there, done that. It doesn't resemble anything you have said.

Chapter 4. Section 4.4 "Reflected Waves"
which describes the commonplace that any line terminated in an
impedance not the same as the characteristic of the line produces
reflections.

No argument - simple wave reflection stuff.

It should come as no surprise that this combination of source power
and re-reflected power will produce a resultant that is dependant upon
the length of the line.

No argument - the superposed net total simply becomes the forward power.

This offers how the voltage variation ALONG a transmission line is
function of BOTH source Z and load Z.

Yes, my experiment seemed to support that assertion but you rejected it.
You have rejected every attempt of mine to agree with you. It appears that
your goal is complete and utter rejection by everyone on r.r.a.a before
you will achieve happiness. Good luck - you are well on your way.

Hi Cecil,

My goal is complete? That was demonstrated at the bench long ago.

You mistake abandonment and rejection, but you did answer my final
question. :-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC