From: on Wed, Sep 13 2006 4:17 am
wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
But the point is that the judicial system has methods besides
self-disqualification to prevent conflict of interest. It does not rely
solely or primarily on judges or jurors disqualifying themselves.
No.
Yes, that's the point.
The point is that ethical people behave ethically.
People who behave ethically at all times don't need safeguards.
...but a soap like "Safeguard" would cut down their body
odor.
You missed that part.
No, I didn't.
And who defines what "ethics" are the right ones?
Morsemen?
Was it ethical to appoint someone with no emergency management
experience to head FEMA?
If they were morsemen they would know everything...
Was it ethical to give lucrative no-bid contracts to a company that
used to be run by a top administrator who helped make the decision?
It would be if they were all morsemen?
Beep, boop,