View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old September 15th 06, 05:59 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.music.classical.recordings,rec.radio.amateur.misc,alt.ham-radio.vhf-uhf,alt.ham-radio.marketplace
[email protected] captain_veritas@hotmail.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 78
Default Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!


wrote:
funny their legal is no such thing as virtual kiddy porn
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


There most certainly is such a thing as virtual kiddy porn. In the
Miller decision, the Supreme Court recognized that there was but didn't
directly address the legality of it.

The physical medium by which the porn is conveyed (hardcopy media,
digital media, etc.) is not the problem. The problem is HOW the porn
is created. In the case of child porn, real children are exploited in
the creation of the images. Children, unlike adults, are legally
considered incapable of deciding of their own free will to participate
in the creation of pornography. That makes creation of that kind of
child porn illegal under a host of criminal statutes.

Anime that portrays cartoon children engaged in sexual acts is not
child pornography by the legal definition. However, it is considered
to be such by most rational adults.

If you want to create virtual child porn there is no law (as of now)
that prohibits you from doing it. But there is also no law that says
anyone has to like it and also no law that says private individuals
have to assist you in its dissemination. If your ISP doesn't like it
they can terminate your service. You can take them to court but it's
doubtful that you would get anywhere. Judges have children, too.