RadioBanter - View Single Post - Hey Todd, After the FCC shuts you down do you plan to Pod-Cast Omega One? BWHAAHAAHAHAHA!

N9OGL

wrote:
wrote:

funny how the Jappnesse see it deferently being ther are about as many
of them as us your statement is a best ameriocontritic at worst plain
bigrotry

The Japanese can see it any way they want. Americans see it
differently. In certain African countries, compulsory clitoridectomies
of young women are considered normal and part of their tribal culture.
Americans see the practice as abhorrent. Different cultures interpret
things differently.

as do many of the far eastern cultures nor was it ever established
that children were being depicted youand other decided that it could
only b children that are dipcted by anime

I'll answer that as soon as you translate it into English.

it is your prevledge to dislike such materail I personaly don't care
for the stuff but I am not so judgemental as you et al

No, you would rather do it than look at it. Just don't do it around my
kids or I'll introduce you to my attorneys: Colt, Ruger, Beretta, Smith
& Wesson.

In theory Todd should be protected by th e courts increasing those
protections are breaking down in practice in theory those that have
been going after should be brought to trail themselves fo r conspricay
to stalk and harrass, not likely In practice

Again, translate that into English, please. I think you said that Todd
is protected by the courts. And he is, but only to the extent that he
is protected from censorship BY THE GOVERNMENT. If his ISP, which is a
private company, doesn't like what Todd is putting through their data
stream they have every right to pull the plug on his service.

The ISP removed me because they believed and was told by the
individuals who complainted that the material was "child pornography"
which it is not, The second problem is "obscenity" it has always been
ruled that only a court can deiced what is obscene, secondly the ISP
has individuals posting material on Adultfinders.com, blogs and other
places on the web which could be consider obscene, so what apply to one
person should apply for all, in this case it does not. Thirdly it is a
common practice amoung ISP to warn a User that they are violation of
their TOS, I recieved no such warning, which now can be consider a "bad
Business practice" since the vast majority of ISP's do warn their users
before removing them from the web. Fourth, the Courts has ruled in
Verizon V RIAA that a ISP doesn't have control of what's on a users
computer, and that and ISP is nothing more then a conduit.(In Verzion V
RIAA, the RIAA sued Verzion fro not handing over the names of
individuals who were sharing music on P2P networks. The Court ruled
that Verzion can't be held accountable for copyright infringement since
the material was on their users computer and not on directly on their
server . Verzion and ISP were nothing more then conduits, like the
phone company and had really no control over the content. ) The CDA
also protects internet service providers of libel for the content their
users put out. The General rule of thumb on the web is, if you don't
like what's on someone website then don't go there. Some of the
individuals visited the site long before complaining and had the chose
not to gom their if they are offended by it. But as for obscentiy goes
as the Supreme court stated "just because one person is offended by the
material doesn't not mean it need to be banned"

Todd N9OGL
OMEGA ONE RADIO
13.556.00 MHz LSB

but ti is amusing the way those that Atack Todd all hide their names
(with the exception of Robeson), and all (without exception sem to
have serious sexious issues fo their own

English, dammit, English! I suppose you were born with the name "an
old friend?"