View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old September 16th 06, 06:08 AM posted to alt.military.cap,rec.radio.amateur.policy
Jerry Jerry is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 47
Default then why does CAP support it occicers lying on behalf of the Army and libeling n US Army vet


wrote in message
...
On 26 Aug 2006 15:15:55 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:


wrote:

Overall, CAP has over 58,000 members in over 1,700 local units across
the United States. CAP members are civilians and are not paid by the
U.S. government for their CAP service. They do not have command
authority over members of the United States military, nor are they
subject to command. As part of recognition of CAP's service to the
USAF, however, CAP members are allowed to wear "U.S." as part of their
uniform, and CAP members are required to render military courtesy to
all members of U.S. and friendly foreign military personnel.


why Does the CAP suport and endorse Officers of the CAP lying about the
existance of whole military iuntis and support their offcier hounding
USA army vet and the libel of US Navy vet

why does cap supportthe libel of thevet of the amred forces
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


I have followed these pointless and immature threads until now.

Here is an an answer to your question. CAP has nothing whatsoever to do
with whatever tripe is being produced in this thread. The contents of a
silly newsgroup or whatever individual members of that organization post in
response to newsgroups is none of CAP's concern, nor do they care. It is
simply not germaine to their mission, purpose, nor does it support, endorse
or NOT endorse the goings-on on the web. It is the same thing as a police
officer yelling, "the sky is falling" and expecting the city that employs
him to be responsible when it does not fall!

That organization has nothing to do with this crap, is not responsible for
the arguments contained herein, nor does it give a damn about any
speculation about what an alleged member *may* be posting on the WWW. So
long as a person who *happens* to be a member of any organization follows
the rules of that organization in the context of their actual participation
in such group, it is none of said group's business and they could not care
less!!!! So give it up. The entire thread is childish, pointless and serves
no point other than trying to play king-of-the-hill.

J