On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 02:48:46 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:

+++
+++"james" wrote in message
m...
+++ On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 00:26:40 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
+++ wrote:
+++
++++++
++++++"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
++++++news:1158451393.841377.178340@m73g2000cwd .googlegroups.com...
++++++ I don't suppose you have a schematic of that available on the
+++web. It
++++++ would be neat to see.
++++++
++++++ Steveo wrote in
++++++ I have a dumpster full.
++++++
++++++ Slow Code wrote:
++++++ You being a typical clueless CB'er and not able to understand
+++schematics,
++++++ it's only natural your dumb ass would toss them in a dumpster.
++++++
++++++ LOL... how right you are SC. What chance does a guy who admits making
++++++ his living in agriculture know about reading a schematic. Absolutely
++++++ hilarious...
++++++
++++++And you make a living breaking federal law.
++++++
+++ ************
+++
+++ I was wondering when someone would mention this. I do seem to remember
+++ a clause in part 95 and/or in 97 that talks about the manufacture of
+++ amplifiers in the range of 25 to 50 MHz. I guess I must go back and
+++ review these to regulatory documents and determine if the FCC has
+++ recended some previous rules.
+++
+++ james
+++
+++They have not. A licensed ham can manufacture one per year that operates
+++without modification in this bandwidth (26-30Mhz). Real commercial amp
+++manufacturers require proof of license before they will divulge the mod
+++procedures to make one operate on 10 meters, or sell the kit to make it
+++operate there.
+++
************

Actually the provison is up to 5 units per year I believe. I should
have differentiated between amature self contruction and that of
comercial manufacture. My fault there.


james