"Barry OGrady" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 08:26:28 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
y.net...
funkbastler wrote:
No, but it darned sure wouldn't hurt to make sure they could drive
something with a standard transmission.

Would you have 1000 people learn to drive a standard
transmission even though only one person out of those
1000 people benefits from it? The cost/benefit ratio
is extremely high.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Someone skilled in driving a vehicle with a manual transmission and
actually
using it can reap a number of performance benefits. These include
improved
gas mileage, better passing performance, better performance in hilly
terrain, etc. If people were required to learn how to drive vehicles with
manual transmissions, more of them might actually choose to drive such
vehicles.

Here most cars run on petrol rather than gas still.

Dee, N8UZE

Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og

In American English, "gas" is short for gasoline. Gasoline is the same as
petrol. The term petrol is generally not used here.