View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 30th 06, 04:29 AM posted to rec.radio.cb
Frank Gilliland Frank Gilliland is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 432
Default Griffey changes his mind...derates to 322 watts PEP

On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:30:28 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote in :

Possible, but with more distortion (oops, he calls it compression) than he
claims.

http://www.telstar-electronics.com/SkyWave%202879AB.pdf

Now was that all so hard, Brian? Did you peruse some websites to rethink
your internet theories? "LOL"



ROTFL! And after being completely humiliated in public because he
can't read a simple x-y graph, it now gets worse because he didn't
even go back to check his OWN graph:

He measured (or so he claims) his "1dB compression point" with an
unmodulated carrier. An unmodulated carrier is the same as PEP (as
well as CW). He doesn't even realize that his 129 watt "measurement"
is the very same "compression point" that he must use to rate SSB
power. So it's 129 watts PEP @ 1dB compression, not 322 watts!

So where did he get 322 watts? You know he didn't measure it or he
would have used the actual measurement the first time. Well, this
shouldn't come as a big suprise, but 322 watts is ALMOST EXACTLY 2dB
down from his original fish-story of 516 watts.

So much for his 'revised' power rating..... "LOL"!!!