View Single Post
  #23   Report Post  
Old October 1st 06, 03:27 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
Opus- Opus- is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 248
Default CW Code Reader recommendation

On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:54:46 -0400, Al Klein
spake thusly:

On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:54:33 GMT, Opus- wrote:

On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:57:18 -0400, Al Klein
spake thusly:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:18:30 -0400, Dave wrote:


Nice strawman. The pixels form a full complete picture. Beeps are just
beeps.


And speech is just noise if you don't understand it.


Speech has infection.


Not if you keep your saliva to yourself.


My bad. Was supposed to be "inflection". Aren't spell checkers
supposed to read your mind?? ;-)

You can say the same sentence 10 different ways
and it can have 10 different meanings depending on the emotion invoked
in the speech. You know....the HUMAN element.


ANY communication you don't understand, including CW, is like that.
You can't tell us what candy tastes like if you're standing on the
street looking through the window of the store.

One dimensional. That they form a recognizable pattern does not
make them more. Humans are highly visual creatures.


Which is why it was said, for many centuries, I suppose, that it's
speech that separates us from the animals. (We're a lot less visually
oriented than a lot of other species.)


See above.


You're simply wrong. Humans are aural creatures. Argue with me when
you get enough education in the subject that you're qualified to
discuss it.


Are YOU qualified? We gather more information about our environment
from vision than any other sense. Now, that's NOT to say that we have
the best vision in the animal kingdom. Our vision is refined and
depended on at the expense of our other senses. Ever have a pet cat or
dog that was blind and deaf? I have and you would be surprised how
well then can adapt with just the sense of smell and touch alone.
Humans need some degree of assistance.

I have listened to
code for years. Being able to make out a few letters does nothing for
me.


I have listened to Turkish for years. Being able to make out a few
words does nothing for me.


But there are a lot of Turks who feel otherwise.


Bet you can easily tell what kind of a mood the speaker is in just by
his tone.


I can tell that on the air too - in CW. I can't tell it here, so I
guess you'll be leaving Usenet.


Why would I want to leave usenet? You're not making any sense. Want to
use CW? Go right ahead, you have that right. Nobody has ever said that
you shouldn't be able to.

I don't speak Ukrainian but I sure knew when my grandmother
was mad at me.


Not by her words, though, which is what you're claiming. So tell me,
what mood am I in at the moment? Evidently, since Usenet is a visual
medium, you can tell.


I never said I could tell by her words. Usent is text, by the way, not
visual.

Or you just don't know what you're talking about.

Your insularity is showing.


Not insularity...humanity.


Which has nothing to do with communication, which every life form
participates in - even those who have no analog of vision.


Not quite sure what point you are making here.
--

(Jim, single dad to Lesleigh [Autistic] 04/20/94)

"What, Me Worry?" A. E. Newman

Please note: All unsolicited e-mail sent to me may, at
my discretion, be posted in this newsgroup verbatim.