Thread: Proposal 3 (US Hams)
View Single Post
  #30   Report Post  
Old October 4th 06, 12:15 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors
U-Know-Who U-Know-Who is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 570
Default Proposal 3 (US Hams)

wrote in message
ups.com...

wrote:
Joel Kolstad wrote:

I think I'm pretty much in agreement with you... 5 WPM is not an
unreasonable
barrier to entry, and I don't particular oppose keeping it around, but
I do
think it seems awfully arbitrary, and this refelcts somewhat poorly on
hams as
a group trying to present themselves as modern and professional.


Well, we agree that we should keep this requirement, but I don't agree
that CW should seen as reflecting poorly on us hams. CW operation,
albeit old fashion, remains a useful skill that I think should be
encouraged. I do acknowledge that the new digital modes and computer
based CW does make CW skills less necessary, but I don't think we
should consider it old fashion or out of date.
it is old fashioned obselete and damaging to the ARS

Not if it keeps you off HF.


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote