View Single Post
  #35   Report Post  
Old October 6th 06, 12:39 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
Not Cocksucker Lloyd Not Cocksucker Lloyd is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,294
Default Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?


Billy Smith wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

Billy Smith wrote:

Mark C. Morgan wrote:


wrote:


get flsuhed clean up ham radio


Talk to any unlicensed stations lately, ****tard?


Have you been jamming 20 meters lately, dumbass?



No, But I hear you jamming and making unidentified transmissions there.
BTW, clueless, the FCC can require any ham tested under the VE system
to retest. They don't have to give a reason. In Roger's case, it sure
backfired because he passed them and even upgraded. It's not much of a
"sanction," is it?


I've been a ham for years lies and misinformation, what else can you expect from silly Billy


Liar. You don't even have the beginner's training wheel no code tech
license. You couldn't pass any of the tests or the code. The FCC can
retest anybody under the VE system. what part of that can't you
understand, stupid? The FCC has the authority, pursuant to
§97.519(d)(2) of the rules to readminister any examination element
previously administered by a volunteer examiner.