From: Dave Heil on Sun, Oct 8 2006 4:28 am
wrote:
From: on Sat, Oct 7 2006 6:39 am
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: on Tues, Oct 3 2006 3:25 pm
wrote:
Tsk, tsk, you've TOLD ME what I should have done in the
military...
What did Jim TELL YOU that you should have been doing, Len?
It's in the archives where Jimmie likes to live. :-)
You can see and read what I did for three years there via:
http://sujan.hallikainen.org/Broadca...s/My3Years.pdf
6 MB in size, takes about 19 minutes download on a dial-up
connection. Twenty pages with many photo illustrations.
High-power HF transmitters. 1953 to 1956.
Reruns of "Look what I did".
Not "I," old soldier-statesman, what *we* in the
battalion did. 8235th Army Unit.
It's for historical interest purposes. The only other one
(a much larger one) is at
www.usarmygermany.com that was
put together by Walter Elkins about the Signal effort in
Europe.
If you sneer too much at the My3Years.pdf, then feel free
to substitute AlphabetSoup.pdf, a copy of my battalion's
own production of its mission tasks circa 1962. That
courtesy of Mr. James Brendage, a retired civilian
engineer who worked at ADA when I was serving there.
If you don't like either of those, then substitute either
one of the two remaining, one on microwave radio relay,
the other on the SCR-300, both from a technical standpoint.
The SCR-300 was the first walkie-talkie, a backpack VHF
transceiver, introduced during WW2, designed and built by
Galvin Mfg (later to be renamed Motorola).
It's all about RADIO and COMMUNICATIONS.
Your ADA sojourn began about fifty-three years back, didn't it, Len?
Why do you live in the past so much?
1. I live for the now and the future, not the past.
2. There is no copyright restriction on government works,
therefore no need to get written permission.
3. There is no security classification on the material
I've presented...neither from the DoD nor private
company non-disclosure agreements.
Greenlee is still a corporation in Rockford, IL, but they
seem to have stopped making "chassis punches" for radio
hobbyists.
There's another of your factual errors.
My bad. :-) Does Greenlee take out ads in QST, QEX?
How about Popular Communications? Any ads in there?
Greenlee still sells chassis
punches--round ones, square ones, those shaped for D-connectors, power
sockets. There's even a hydraulic punch set. The U.S. Government buys
loads of them. The company's "hole making" product information can be
downloaded--all 7.9 mb of it.
http://www.greenlee.com/product/index.html
Are you on commission from Greenlee? :-)
No sweat, old soldier-statesman, I've been IN Greenlee on
a visit, have seen the little corner of one building where
two guys were making punches and files.
Send your download to Lowes or Home Depot corporate head-
quarters, see if they are interested.
I still have old Greenlee chassis punches from before the
60s, still wrapped in oily paper, get checked now and then
for rust. They were all used decades ago...only two have
been reground on the edges (did that myself, no problem).
Not much use for those punches now in the solid-state era.
Especially when there are so many KITS available for those
who claim to design their own. :-)
Jimmie ever do any "programming in machine language?" At any
time? I have. Want me to list them? :-)
That's not necessary, Len. Why not tell us any of the things you've
done in amateur radio?
You mean the software mods I made for two other hams
don't apply? [Microchip Corp. PIC microcontrollers]
How about a series of bandpass filters for the HF bands
where I did the toroid windings, capacitor selection,
assembly, shielding, and alignment? Using my own
computer program "LCie4"?
Oh, be still my heart, the great soldier-statesman has
put me down! :-)
Only a fraction of the American people are watching HDTV. Most aren't
even aware of what will hit them in a couple of years. People are still
running out to K-Mart and Wally World and buying new *analog* TV sets.
Thank you for the attempt at being an electronics
industry "insider." It is nice to know that someone
cares.
There'll be a big learning curve for the non-city dwelling owners of new
HDTV receivers. They'll find that they have to use antennas with fairly
high gain, preamps and rotators. They'll be using those rotators quite
often. I ended up buying a Channel Master rotator with remote control
and memory.
That's nice. Are you going for some kind of amateur HDTV
award or contest?
He knows very little about me and has resorted to wild speculation and
untruths for a long time.
Tsk. Typical bluffmanship on Jimmie's part.
It was an accurate statement, Leonard. You don't know much about Jim.
You have resorted to wild speculation and untruths.
How can something be "untrue" if there is NO basis to
judge? Id est, as in his never saying...but you MUST
call a speculation a LIE?
Sounds like the old Waffen SS trick again.
ARRL carefully OMITS certain items of history and IMPLIES
amateurs are 'responsible' for all advances. :-)
You've made another untruthful statement.
My apology for offending your religious beliefs. However,
the TRUTH is not heresy.
Jimmie wanna see my home workshop? Have it digitized,
was sent to three others. Wanna see the HP 608D and
the 606 signal generators, the 60 MHz dual-channel
scopes (note plural), the 1 KW Variac below the bench?
You're kind of light in the Variac department, Len. Don't you have
anything which will handle real power?
Yes...it's labeled "4 Stacks" on aeronautical sectional
charts.
BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[pilot joke, old soldier-statesman]
You're a pathetic and childish geezer, Len.
Awwww...you are TOO sweet... :-)
You really need a way to fill your idle hours.
"Idle?"
BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Paul didn't say anything about a background check, Len. He addressed
the IEEE Code of Ethics.
YOU addressed the IEEE Code of Ethics, failing to write
all of it. Paul picked up on that and wanted to get in
some kind of "fight" about it.
YOU have the mailing address of the IEEE. Feel free to
write them and complain about my behavior in the news-
group and how that "violates" the Professional Code of
Ethics about engineering WORK. Be sure and document
everything from BOTH sides, such as your own name-
calling ("You're a pathetic and childish geezer").
Tell the IEEE that your "soldier-statesman" image has
been "tarnished" by "insults" in here. Go ahead, make
your day.
Are you discussing your tiny, dusty Johnson?
No, but you seem to have overmuch interest in it.
Did you munch a lot of nuts while in Guinea-Bisseau?
[cashews are their biggest export...]
As always to you, ByteBrothers famous phrase invoked...