"DaveArea51" wrote in message
...
With the review of the latest and greatest from TenTec in the most recent
QST,
I couldn't resist pulling the review of the K2, also from an (older) QST,
from
the file cabinet and comparing the K2 measured performance specifications
against those of the latest TenTec radio, the Orion. In virtually all
cases,
the receiver parameters reported by ARRL for the K2 are at least as good
as the
respective parameters of the Orion transeciver, and in some, even better.
I
could find only one case where the Orion outmeasured the K2 receiver. The
blocking dynamic range of the Orion at 5 kHz with the preamp on is a
little
better than the K2 by 5 or so dB. That's it ! !

I own a K2/100 and I must confess it has none of the digital birdies of
the
TenTec Omni VI (10-meters, especially, is particularly bad) which I also
own .
In addition, the K2 handles readability of a signal, be it SSB or CW,
noticably
better than the Omni VI during noisey band conditions. Oh, and I
especially
like the fully settable Jones crystal filter which is standard in the K2.
The
designers at Elecraft did one excellent job of design! Even for the
money, I
doubt if you could find a significantly better transceiver on the amateur
market today. Spend $1k for the K2 and you won't get much more
performance
that counts by spending $5k.

Dave - W0LEV

PS: No, I'm not associated in any way with Elecraft. However, I have
high
respect for the designers at Elecraft.

Hi Dave,
Eric has just posted updated K2 specs on their web site- might be the new
BDR @ 5KHz is improved.

Dale W4OP
.