On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:44:42 GMT, Slow Code spake
thusly:

Opus- wrote in
:

On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:08:42 GMT, Slow Code spake
thusly:

wrote in
groups.com:


Cecil Moore wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
It's funny, and most telling. The no-code hams have everything
over 30 MHz, but it's the code hams that are the one's moving ham
radio forward and doing anything technical wise.

If that's true, it's certainly a change from half a
century ago when we HF hams observed the VHF/UHF
hams revolutionizing amateur radio with their
technical expertise.

Uhhhhhhhh...Cecil...??!?!

Did you actually make that up, or just quote someone else who is
equally ill informed?

Most of the people who were "moving forward" half a century ago
were ALSO folks who were active on and well known in HF circles...

Unless, of course, you're now going to take Lennie's spin and tell
us that any / everything reported in QST, CQ, etc, was only
"self-serviing rhetoric"...?!?!

Try again.

Steve, K4YZ


Anyone that puts out an argument to keep the code requirement gets
teased by Cecil. He loves to throw out some goof-ball counter reply to
try to be-little the original argument.

Pot, meet kettle.


No. All my arguments are good sound arguments.

Oh PuhlEEEZE!!! Spelling Canada with a "K" is a good sound argument?
Calling me a "lazy ass" is a good sound argument? Claiming I get a
handout is a good sound argument?

You have NEVER put out ANY kind of argument at all!!! Why don't you
try to cite some source that back up any of your "good sound
arguments".

Free hint: Hurling insults and innuendo does NOT a "good sound
argument" make.

Hope this helps.
--

(Jim, single dad to Lesleigh [Autistic] 04/20/94)

"What, Me Worry?" A. E. Newman

Please note: All unsolicited e-mail sent to me may, at
my discretion, be posted in this newsgroup verbatim.