View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old October 14th 06, 03:09 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
[email protected] hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default ATTN: Mrs x: You Let Him Lie Like This In Public?


wrote:
From:
on Fri, Oct 13 2006 10:15am


wrote:
From: on Wed, Oct 11 2006 5:56 pm


Nothing's changed with you. You still always go after the women folk
who have nothing to do with your inability to get along with others.

I'm not "going after" anyone, Brain.

Sure you are. You go after other people's wives and kids. You have a
history of it.

Nope. No one's been "gone after".

You've gone after my wife. You've gone after my kids before. To say
you haven't is a lie.


True. The USMC Imposter has gone after my wife, insulted
my parents, insulted my wife's universities, insulted just
about anything I've mentioned in here. Imposter then says
"I lie" since he doesn't know right from wrong.


If Robesin adjudicates that someone or thing is wrong, the persecution
starts, and there are no legal bounds to his methods.


He doesn't know right from wrong.

If we say he rightly violates reality (he does), he turns right
around and says we do that. It is a non-argument. All it does
is delude him in his non-justification of his actions.


Its also interesting that when you use one of his tactics on him, he
says that justifies him doing it in the first place. Such as Mark
out-assholing him.

His behavior is a syndrome of someone who will shortly fall
into certifiable insanity.


The rubber room is waiting.

I obviously don't care for your tactics involving peoples families in
your problems.


Imposter has so many problems he needs all the "care"
he can get.


There's one over-arching problem.


There are several but all inter-related. With the Imposter
everything boils down to him always saying he is "right"
which then "justifies" (in his mind) all of his insults of
others. Everything then becomes a very "personal" battle
with him. The subject of a thread is tossed aside in his
tirades and he focusses sharply on "battling" his opponents.


He quotes himself in here, then claims I have misquoted him.

No, you've made tons of typo's this week. This typo was made as your
were calling someone stupid. If you're going to call someone stupid,
take extra care that in the process you don't end up looking like an
idiot.


Brian, it matters not.


1. Imposter was long ago divorced from reality and
knowledge of right and wrong.


2. As a result of (1) he usually looks like an idiot.


3. (1) and (2) repeated endlessly until his Google message
total exceeds that of Cecil Moore.


Pretty much.


Cecil was here years before the Imposter. Cecil Moore is
not an offensive person. The Imposter is an offensive
person.


I liked Cecil a lot. I especially liked him when he was 100 feet tall.
(Now Robesin will say I was hot for Cecil.)

Nope. One day some university is going to get a couple hundred
thousand bucks to study your profile on RRAP. Probably just after you
hit the news big time.


Imposter is traveling to Amish country of Pennsylvania?


It's on the way to the Dayton Hamvention.


Ah so! :-)


He'll have to file a travel voucher requesting circuitious travel.

Imposter is going to NJ to learn methods of offing
patients from a nurse there who did it?


Sounds like a circle-jerk in the making.


Imposter may have already started in TN?


Did the Man-Nurse in NJ ever get convicted?

You are largely ignored by the pro-code test contingent. They despise
you, but you aren't likely to hear that because you are a bully. They
fear you.


Must be fear.


They can't control him, one of their OWN.


"Loose cannon" doesn't begin to describe Robesin.


I know, I know...but if I call him an asshole, I'm insulting
the real assholes!


They will be highly offended.

What you posted is plain for anyone to see.


Thousands of posts worth of insults and failure to discern
right from wrong...not to mention the infamous IMPOSTER of
the USMC act carried on for years...years in which the
Imposter NEVER supplied a single item of proof, not even
a snapshot of himself on "active duty" during 18 years.


He was probably in "Secret Ops." No photos allowed.


It was so "secret" that all documents were marked "burn
before reading..." :-)


Wonder if he ever used the Code Name "Mr. Phelps?"

Is Paul going to let you play "Excrement Commando" in RRAP?


Probably he will.


The hell he will.


We will have to wait and see...


I'll give him the benefit...

Amateur extras will have all sorts of
"permissions" versus ordinary folk in the "moderation"
period. Those who disagree with amateur extras will
never have their posts shown in public.


I disagree with that opinion. And if it turns out that way, there is
recourse.


At best that "recourse" would be NOT posting and NOT
accessing the newsgroup. There is NO sign that anyone
"in charge" today or the last few years has done
anything in regards to "offensive" postings. There is
a curious, prolonged NON-response in Google whenever
anyone clicks on their message option button.


Long delayed echoes... (RADAR term involving range folding).

Besides, the Code Test issue is moments away from being
resolved.


Might not even be done this year. The R&O on the
"omnibus" issue began in 2004 and didn't get settled
until 2006. The code test NPRM of last year (05-235)
might be handled in 2007.


True, but in ham-years, that is is just a blink away. I passed my
Novice exams twenty (20) years ago this month and the Old-Timers still
classify me as a newbie.

The value of this forum is tied to that single issue.
Paul's moderation will, like the code exam, become an unnecessary
regulation.


Interesting viewpoint! I like it.


Hopefully Paul won't generate the "hard-feelings" that the code debate
has.

His own (SECOND) wife can't control his 5-hour sessions
on his computer while he is busy shoveling **** on his
"enemies."

A real head case he is...


He's nuts.


I agree but there are others in here who must have
ABSOLUTES to justify such opinions. If he's not "nuts" in
the absolute sense, he will be soon.


He's nuts now.