Thread: What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 17th 06, 02:11 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
Papa Dog Papa Dog is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 125
Default What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
In article .net,
says...
 wrote in
oups.com:


wrote:
On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote:


wrote:
 wrote:
You may
not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree
that we have a problem. Right?
notice you have gotten no reply


Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response...

The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care..

indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse
than the problem because it does not promote cw forever

Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big
enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with
any valid reasoning.


You see no value in being effective communicators,

The most effective communication is plain english!

73

Chris
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote