View Single Post
  #17   Report Post  
Old October 18th 06, 02:08 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
K4YZ K4YZ is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 454
Default What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?


wrote:
wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
It seems to me they want to eliminate all testing.

That's what happens when no-codes and nickle hams start running
things. Or is that ruining things?


Naw, ARRL isn't trying to do that. I haven't seen anything in their
current goals that would lead me to believe that they are trying to
send the rest of our spectrum the way of 11 meters. I may be wrong, but
I don't think the FCC would do that again (if any of the current
commissioners are students of FCC history that is) even if the ARRL
suggested it.

The numbers of Hams out there and how it's been dropping though the
more recent years is an alarming trend. With the age of the average ham
creeping higher, this hobby is set to all but die out in the USA within
a generation unless something changes.


indeed


What an inciteful response (No...I didn't mispell that...Pun
intended...)

Surely you see the problem that the ARRL is trying to address.

honestly I don't think he does
You may
not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that
we have a problem. Right?


notice you have gotten no reply


He didn't get a response because :

(a) His comments were concise, well written and in proper
English...Traits that make it difficult for YOU to understand or
"respond" to.

(b) Accurate and able to stand on their own merits.

Steve, K4YZ