View Single Post
  #31   Report Post  
Old October 20th 06, 09:29 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
[email protected] Mark@kb9rqz.org is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 135
Default CW-forever Guys are gonna go balistic!

On 19 Oct 2006 19:36:33 -0700, wrote:

wrote:
On 19 Oct 2006 07:34:27 -0700,
wrote:

why do you presume to think they don't read len ader particualrly

Because he's a non-stakeholder who has been blatantly abusing his right
to comment on matters before the FCC involving the amateur service for
years. A presumption based on applied common sense and experience.


where has he iditeifed himself as a no stakeholder as far as I know
he is a citizen?


We can all toss comments at all NPRMs, that's not the point. The topic
under discussion is Anderson's behavior during ham NPRM commenting
periods and the way the FCC probably handles his "comments".

and for some reason you chose to imply that Len coments are treated
differently than say mine
As far as
stakes go Anderson himself made it transparently clear years ago that
he has no stake whatsoever in the regulation of the amateur radio
service when he stated that he is not a ham and does not have any
intention of becoming a ham in the future.


and what has that got to do with anythiung at all

and what abuse?


Flooding the FCC with 200 comments on one ham radio NPRM is juvenile
and abusive behavior every way you look at it. And it's not in the
direction of supporting the cause of you NCTAs.

sas I understand he filed one coment during the main period and a
bunch (i'll accept your count till len says different) of reply coment
in the period set aside for that

that is on paper at aleast how the system is suposed to work

doing things the right way is abusive in your mind?

did you read a different constituions than I


Again that's not the point, the point is how his submissions are
regarded and dealt with after the FCC has processed them in accordance
with all the laws under which they operate.

it is precisely the point

You gotta be as naive as a
newborn if you think the FCC attaches as much value to any of
Anderson's nonsense as they do, for instance, to the inputs submitted
by the ARRL.


and where was it claimed that Len was taken as seriously as the ARRL
he should have been in theory but that is theory

nope they know full well they wait long and someone will mount a legal
chalenge to code testing and that will be that

Could be but until somebody actually lays down the cash it takes to
mount the challenge you're waiting for y'all behave yourself Colonel
and stay above 30 Mhz.


indeed the cash is problem I was well on the way leading to the NPRM
then the backer back out thinking the FCC is finaly goign to take care
it


Usta be's, shoulda done's and could've beens are a dime a dozen, you
either walk the walk or you don't.


your point? that one should waste money forcing the FCC to act in
accordance with the laws of the USA?



the longer thay wait the more likely the challange become but they
(the ffc ) are on record as saying it will be out after the onibus and
before the end of the years


Don't let the suspense keep you awake at night.


I don't esp as there is no supense we are just waiting on the dates of
actgion

w3rv

http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com