RadioBanter - View Single Post - N0IMD Caught In Two-Faced Flames AGAIN

Dave Heil · October 21st 06, 04:24 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: on Thurs, Oct 19 2006 2:46 am

[Jimmie and Davie are interchangeable entities now?]

wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Wed, Oct 18 2006 3:06 pm
wrote:
From: on Mon, Oct 16 2006 4:48am
wrote:
From: on Sun, Oct 15 2006 4:17 pm
BECAUSE he has NO proof AT ALL he gets called an IMPOSTER.

Yet Hans Brakob has made it available. Frank
Gilliland has made it available.
So? Who are *you* to demand proof?
A MILITARY VETERAN, Jimmie, something you will NEVER be.
MILITARY VETERANS get to demand proof? Really?
Actually, employers get to, and people that are witness to exaggerated
claims of "hostile actions" get to. Anyone witnessing exaggerated
claims OUGHT to demand proof.

I never saw myself as
superior to other citizens who never donned a military uniform.
It's a lot like Len being a professional radio, and being told that
he'll never be an amateur.
I never knew that Len was a professional radio. I'll make a note of it.

Op is the operative word.

That word wasn't included.

Why would anyone as smug as you make a note
of anything?

I'd make a note, as I wrote, because I never knew that Len was a
professional radio. Should the term be "PROFESSIONAL radio"?

Hans is a veteran, Frank is a veteran, Brian Burke is a
veteran.
I'm a veteran. Dan from W4-land is a veteran. Do we get to demand
proof for your sphincter post? It'd be nice to know where and when the
artillery barrage took place and if your friend Gene can confirm it.

Fair enough. When does Robesin provide documentation of his claims of
participating in seven (7) hostile actions?

I'd say that a good time would be right after Len bares his soul and
admits that he engaged in being an imposter in regard to what it is like
to go through an artillery barrage. I'm guessing that won't happen.

Why after?

Why do you think it might be? It might be that the individual making
countless statements of "IMPOSTER" regarding the military service of
another, is himself guilty of being an imposter. What do you think
about Len's description of what it is like to go through an artillery
barrage?

When one takes an Oath putting their LIFE on the line in
military service it becomes very serious indeed.

Well, it could become very serious if you ever actually had occasion to
put your life on the line.

Would any of seven (7) hostile actions be such an occasion?

I'd say it would.

If it actually happened.

Ok. Now what?

One
helluva lot MORE SERIOUS than having some amateur radio
hobby with imagined self-glory.

...only if you were called upon to actually put your life on the line,
Len. Otherwise, you need to quit wrapping yourself in bunting and
stepping up on that soapbox.

No bunting.

I see bunting. Len is wrapped in it.

By serving (in the military), you are in the que for
whatever comes up.

I didn't like queues when I was in the military. I sure don't have to
queue for anything now.

We're aware of your dislike for military service, and you're certainly
not in the que any longer.

If you're aware of my dislike, kindly fill me in on it. How did my
dislike manifest itself? After all, unlike many, I got the job I
wanted. I was able to skip technical school.

My inactive service committment ends this
year.

I don't know what to make of your statement. What am I supposed to
feel, think or write?

I noticed that you made a spelling error. I've decided not to comment
on it. Turn about is fair play.

Lots of folks weren't up to it. Jim/N2EY is one
such person.

That's a pretty bold supposition on your part. What indicates that
someone "wasn't up to it"?

You'll have to ask Jim what the problem was.

Is that what you did? You asked him and he told you that he wasn't up
to it?

He hasn't been
forthcoming with that information.

That didn't seem to stop you from ascribing motivation or lack thereof.

Would the term "self-glory" come into play in discussing a guy who went
into great detail describing what it was like to undergo an artillery
barrage, except that he had never been involved in such an event?

Prolly no more than a guy that got caught claiming participation in
seven (7) hostile actions.

I've seen no detailed description on Steve's part. Len's description
was quite detailed, right down to sphincter.

Everyone's got one. They all stink.

I've not thought to check.

Would you be inclined to describe such an individual as a sort of
imposter? It is certainly something for you to ponder.
It is certainly something for Robesin to ponder, wouldn't you agree?

Would I?

No, maybe you wouldn't.

Then there's the chance that I would.

Len says something and he's a liar.

I think you may be on to something. Do you think that artillery barrage
took place in peacetime Japan? Could it have taken place near Greenlee
Industries? Might it have been in Len's neighborhood when Len and
others in his area were stirred up over zoning changes?

Robesin
says the same thing seven different ways and he's good to go.

What did Steve say about his actions? Did he ever describe an action
which you know did not take place? Do you see a difference? I see an
old codger with egg on his face, calling another military veteran an
IMPOSTER without a shred of evidence. I did find a web site which lists
Steve by full name and USMC rank. Did you find it?

It's not
hard to figure you out.

It is if you take the time to do it right.

Dave K8MN