October 23rd 06, 12:39 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
|
|
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
'Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:33:30 GMT, Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
groups.com:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
according to him anyone not devoted to cw is a lowlfie
That's really sad.
...and pathetic. No one should have to go through life as a
lowlfie.
(extraneous groups deleted)
So who do you think Slow Code is? Kelly? Coslo? Deignan?
I haven't the slightest idea.
Well, I know "Slow Code" is not me.
Beyond that, he could be anybody with a computer and an internet
connection. "Slow Code" could be Len Anderson, who has used at least
seven different screen names here - that we know of.
How many screen names have you used here - that you know of?
"Slow Code" could
be Brian Burke, N0IMD,
Slow Code could be Jim/N2EY, despite protests that it isn't him.
Ditto Robesin, Coslo, Bruce, Dan, Larry Roll, or anyone else who
"appears" to be absent from RRAP.
Why don't you build up your CW skills and quit worrying about who
everyone is.
whjy should he He has passed the test and hold a general class license
Mark in the Dark.
He can keep building his code skills to make himself a better operator.
Why does everyone only want to do the minimum and not improve. It's
because they're lazy. They don't care to be good communicators, all they
want is a hand-out license that doesn't require skill or knowledge. If
that's what they want they should have stayed on CB.
SC
|