Thread
:
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
View Single Post
#
43
October 28th 06, 12:43 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
[email protected]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,554
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Dee Flint wrote:
"Chris" wrote in message
Already tried it.
And dismissed it.
esp dimissing the abilty of the human operator of the machine to fill
in the problems and correct the process
As I said while it is the best that is available, it
is
still far below the capabilities of a human operator.
Correction. ...a few human operators.
indeed the PC alone far exceeds the abilties of many licensed ham
operators but hat doesn't count
I've tried it
under a
wide range of conditions and CWGet still needs a pretty good signal to
function.
Dee, N8UZE
Morse Myth #119: All CW signals are good signals (Its the corollary of
Morse Myth #1: CW always gets through).
Unrelated to my comments.
You would like to think that, but without efforts from folks like Carl,
Bill, Len, hans, myself and others, you would still be repeating such
myths, and would never make statements such as "Not all CW signals are
good."
You can thank us, but that's probably not very likely.
No one has said all CW signals are good.
And they aren't.
If they were always good, CWGet
would always work, which it doesn't. The ones who tout the software
solution are those who wish that it would always work.
And those who dismiss the software solution think all amateur operators
are superb morsemen.
In addition, I have repeatedly stated that each and every mode has its
advantages and disadvantages.
If you were to compare and contrast all existing modes, it think it is
likely that you would claim that CW is the best mode.
The extremists on each side don't want to
hear that.
Dee, N8UZE
Because of the efforts made to dismiss countless Morse Myths over the
years, you were just now able to state that not all CW signals are good
without 1x2 PCTAs pooh poohing such talk.
well it is a thankless job
Dees coming around in her own way, but the brainwashing that she's
undergone is strong. Perhaps in another decade... if there's still an
amateur radio. If only she had been able to think spontaneously and
resist, the brainwashing wouldn't have been so well received.
Reply With Quote
[email protected]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by
[email protected]