Thread
:
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
View Single Post
#
141
October 30th 06, 01:44 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
Dave Heil
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 750
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
wrote:
From: "Dee Flint" on Sat, Oct 28 2006 10:27pm
wrote in message
Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
If you go a bit north of Rocketdyne in Canoga Park, CA, you
would reach Hughes Aircraft Missle Division.
"Missile", Len.
Nice place.
I worked there when Ramo-Wooldridge occupied that facility.
Stouffers ran both the RW and HAC cafeteria, good good food.
Is the Phoenix air-air missle
"Missile", Len. Once is a typo.
considered part of "aerospace?"
I'd say so, and thousands of other engineers would say so.
However, for a missle there is a STRONG interplay between
the tin benders and solder slingers to get an optimum
package with the most bang for its buck...and get it to the
target RELIABLY. HAC has had an excellent record in air-air
misslery, beginning with their first, the GAR-1 and GAR-2
(launched from F-102s, Shrub's NG plane).
Air-air missles...
"Missile", Len. Once is a typo.
...NEED little computers on board along with air data sensors
and control acuators to do their task.
"Actuators", Len.
I might have had some past jobs that made me a 'vassal' but
at Rocketdyne I never had any responsibility for pressure
VESSLES. That was for the smoke-and-fire guys to do. :-)
"Vessels", Len.
By the way, the almost-catastrophy of the Apollo 13 mission
was a LOX tank blowing up in the Service Module. Specifially
it was failure of the LOX stirring thermostate...
"Thermostat", Len.
...within it, a
design responsibility of mechanicals with thermodynamics
specialty. :-) [one of three VESSLES holding LOX in the
Service Module]
"Vessels", Len. Once is a typo.
The point is BEING ABLE TO DO THE JOB, not the number of
diplomas (suitable for framing) on display, or the number
of alphabetic characters one can put after a signature.
Like "IEEE"?
Does anyone NEED a radio license to effectively run,
repair, maintain, calibrate, test a radio transmitter? NO.
The license is a LEGAL requirement. The TEST for any radio
license, amateur or commercial, is ridiculously SIMPLE, and
has NEVER been made complex or comprehensive by the
FCC. It is an AUTHORIZATION by a government agency,
NOT a "qualification". It might as well be a fancy hunting
or fishing license.
You haven't passed an exam for the most basic amateur radio hunting and
fishing license, old timer.
However, the FCC regulations for radio amateurs is strict
on technical performance, a responsibility for EACH
licensee. Can you do any sort of comprehensive test to
insure compliance with the LAW? I can. I could long
before any degree was received.
You don't have to worry about doing so. You aren't involved.
Dave K8MN
Reply With Quote
Dave Heil
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Dave Heil