wrote:
From: on Sat, Nov 4 2006 5:08 am
wrote:
wrote:
wrote:

You are *often* mistaken, or incorrect. Not "always".

No. You are MISTAKEN. You made an ERROR. You are WRONG.

How is that possible, Len?

Are you *always* mistaken or incorrect? That's what you seem to be
saying.

You are using your OWN subjective opinion as a "fact."

What subjective opinion? I have commented on some of your mistakes
here. Your errors are frequent enough that any rational person would
conclude that you are often mistaken, or incorrect.

In itself that is WRONG.

How?

Is it WRONG to express ideas that do not agree with your ideas?

You're avoiding the issue, Len. It's not about me.

No. You are MISTAKEN. You made an ERROR. You are WRONG.

YES, your replies are about YOU.

They are written *by* me, but they are not *about* me.

World War II *ended* 61 years ago. [the Korean War has
*never* ended...it is in a state of truce begun 53 years
ago]

So what? Morse Code played an important role in both.

How do you KNOW? Is that recorded history by ANY branch of the
military?

Yes.

Be more specific, please.

Here's a first-person account:

http://www.smecc.org/albert.htm

Many radio amateurs are trying to stop a change in the amateur radio
regulations because they think it is a bad change. Yet you criticize
them.

No. You are MISTAKEN. You made an ERROR. You are WRONG.

You do criticize them for opposing what they think is a bad change.
That's a fact.

I criticize their OPINIONS because I do not think elimination
of the amateur radio code test is "bad."

You criticize far more than OPINIONS, Len. That's a fact.

Where did I say that? Show me.

You've claimed I wrote that, but you can't show us where or when I did.
You are either mistaken or being deceptive.

Tsk, even if the EXACT QUOTE is presented to you, you will
claim "no error" somehow. :-)

Can you tell the future, Len? I think not.

You know, everyone knows what YOU wrote in here recently.

Just show the quote, Len.

Your ploy of misdirection is itself a misdirection. Stay
on the subject.

You can't find the quote, can you, Len? You realize you misquoted me
but won't admit it.

If I really wrote that, show us. Prove me wrong by quoting where I
wrote the phrase you quoted. You quoted it with the " symbol, meaning a
direct, verbatim quote.

No. You are MISTAKEN. You made an ERROR. You are WRONG.

How? You have not shown us the exact quote.

Google doesn't accept italics. As a result, double-quote marks
are used for a variety of uses in writing here.

Double-quote marks are NOT SOLELY descriptive of "quotations."

Then show us the exact quote.

Either ANSWER the amateur radio policy subject or quit
the misdirection into punctuation use.

You're not the moderator, Len.

Just show us the exact quote - if you can. I think you can not.

I think you don't like my real-estate analogy because of what it
proves.

No. You are MISTAKEN. You made an ERROR. You are WRONG.

Really? Your behavior proves otherwise.

YOU are NOT INVOLVED with Los Angeles laws.

So what? Real estate laws are not that much different here.

YOU do NOT live here.

How do you know for sure?

YOU do NOT pay real estate taxes here.

Even if that's true, so what? That has no effect on the validity of the
analogy. Do you think only those who pay real estate taxes can comment
on real estate laws?

That "analogy" has NO BEARING on the subject of this newsgroup,
NOTHING concerning amateur radio.

Yes, it does.

Here's how it works:

You opposed a change to the real estate zoning in your neighborhood
because you thought it was a bad change. You wanted to keep the zoning
as it was when you were young and had just moved into your house, more
than 40 years ago.

You don't like "outsiders" trying to change the zoning, or even
*commenting* on it in a public forum.

BUT,

You are an outsider to amateur radio. You are not a radio amateur, have
never been one, and will probably never be one. Your only involvement
in amateur radio is your wordy, error- and insult-ridden postings to
Usenet, and your lengthy comments to FCC.

Yet you are trying to force changes in amateur radio regulations. And
when radio amateurs, who *are* involved with amateur radio, oppose
those changes, you criticize them.

We amateurs have what we have because we asked for it and defended it.

No. You are MISTAKEN. You made an ERROR. You are WRONG.

"You amateurs" bought into existing regulations. YOU did
NOT make the law.

If you think you "made" the law, be specific and present
proof that you did do so.

We amateurs have gotten the laws changed. Just like that real estate
developer....

You were not and are not involved.

No. You are MISTAKEN. You made an ERROR. You are WRONG.

How? Did you get an amateur radio license? Set up a station?

Federal regulations are NOT closed to the public. US amateur
radio is NOT a fraternal organization were ONLY "members"
get to say anything.

Who said anything different?

You've been spamming the FCC for years, but you haven't been very
effective at it.

And besides those windy comments and your postings to usenet, you just
aren't involved in amateur radio, Len.

I know considerable about US amateur radio,

All of it second-hand.

know several radio amateurs personally,

So what? Doesn't mean you are involved.

have written for an amateur
radio periodical as both contributor and editor.

And that ended almost a quarter century ago. Old stuff.

A personal desire unthinking
of future radio hobbyists whom you've never met, whom you know
nothing.

'*of* whom you know nothing'

No. You are MISTAKEN. You made an ERROR. You are WRONG.

You made the error, Len. I just pointed it out.

I know several not yet licensed in amateur radio.

So do I.

US amateur radio is NOT a secret society. It is not a
government-classified secret.

Who said it was?

All I said is that you're not involved. And you're not.

Many radio amateurs are trying to stop a change in the amateur radio
regulations because they think it is a bad change. Yet you criticize
them.

Yes.

You just admitted that you criticize them personally - not just their
opinions.

How is that "wrong?"

How is it wrong for someone to try to change zoning laws?

As always to you, ByteBrothers famous phrase invoked...

Is that the phrase "Do as I say, not as I do"?

No. You are MISTAKEN. You made an ERROR. You are WRONG.

How? All I did was ask a question. How can it be wrong to ask a
question?

Can't you answer that question?

Use your mighty web searching skills and FIND OUT for
yourself. YOU can do it. You seem to be too LAZY to
find out! Tsk, tsk, the mighty newsgroup morse warrior
NOT DEDICATED ENOUGHT to find out!

"ENOUGHT"?

If you cannot search the 'net, get help from those who can.
I will not help you since you "*often*" say I am "mistaken."

Nope.

I say you are often mistaken.

And you are.