View Single Post
  #20   Report Post  
Old November 10th 06, 11:42 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
Closed Course Closed Course is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 4
Default What does a person think when they hear "retested ham radio operator'?



Twice Tested General lied:
On 9 Nov 2006 05:02:10 -0800, Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrong again, fatty,.

imagine that! wrote:

Slow Code wrote:




GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L.

Wiseman,
KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the

supervision of
an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for

retesting
by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled. Applicants
appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur Radio license
consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had written Wiseman on
March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made aware of "an ongoing
personal dispute" between Wiseman and another licensee that included
allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special

Counsel
for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two
licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the

FCC
had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to
allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20 meters.


ROFL, I always laugh at that one.


...


The retest letter made no reference to interference; in fact gave no
reason for requiring the retest. Such a request is part of the
Volunteer Examining program. It could have been made for any number of
reasons that may have had nothing to do with any of the addressee's
actions. An investigation into the VE group that gave the test, would
be a good example.


ROFL, I always laugh at that reply, because he posts it so much.


Then you also laugh at your reflerction of your pig like face in the
mirror. Why can't you even pass the General test even once?


It has always been a hoot to watch him twist that to suit his lies.

The letter sent specifically states, "an ongoing personal dispute between
Wiseman and another licensee that included allegations of interference or
jamming on 20 meters."

Un-Wiseman, take NOTE once and for all; The letter does NOT imply that you
were being retested for, as you say, "any number of reasons". It
specifically states, "allegations of interference or jamming on 20 meters"
and dance as you try, you cannot change the meaning of the text. It is no
secret you did this, Un-Wiseman. You simply make yourself look even more
foolish than you already are by continually lying about the letter, thus
allowing us poke to the soft spot in Baby Wiseman's little head so we can
hear him squeal.

Nice dancing, though.