View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Old November 15th 06, 12:48 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
John Smith John Smith is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Default Only "Would-be-Einsteins" need apply...

Jim Kelley wrote:


Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:

There's theory, and then there's fact.



What fact????


Do you not believe in fact, Cecil?

You can't even prove that you exist. :-)


There's evidence indicating that I do, and none indicating that I
don't. So I'm at least a valid theory. What I can't prove is that I
don't exist. For a number of reasons.

73, Jim AC6XG


Personally Jim, I doubt your existence. I have a theory you are much
more likely to be a "brain in a bottle", you are nothing more than a
brain in some aliens laboratory and housed within life support
equipment, the body you see as yours is only imagined and a very good
illusion.

Some of us here are just like you, but I am real (a "control" in the
experiment you are involved in.) And, I do understand how all this can
be so confusing.

Regards,
JS