David or Jo Anne Ryeburn wrote:

wrote:
It might help if the language was made more understandable. Isn't the
problem in getting an absolute ground reference point at the end of
the dipole?

Nope, that's not the problem. The language I am using is standard.

For you, maybe, but not for the average amateur radio operator. Instead
of trying to demonstrate how smart you are, how about trying to explain the
concept in words that the average amateur radio operator can understand?
Feynman took that approach in his book, _QED_.

Again, the problem goes away if you use a 4 dimensional model and define
the 4th dimensional path distance to ground as zero.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----