wrote:
On 26 Dec 2006 09:24:50 -0800, "Andy the Perv Timberlake"
wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 21:37:02 GMT, "JOHN D"
wrote:
"only thing sad is how long it took and the Damage the ProTest folks
have done to service delaying the enevitable result"
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
--
Exactly. I hope it's not too late to recover.
I hope not as well I hope we can mange to at least hold our numbers
with the proCoder dying off
You claimed if they ever dropped the code requirement you'd leave here,
Markie, another lie?
has not been done yet woger and that only aplied to RRAP not RRAM
where you troled this in from woger
Wrong again, pervert. You see your woger behind every post, don't you,
retard?