Heh, I didn't read all that you had to say but I am glad you posted and
hopefully you told your friends to come on over and join in with
you,.The more the merrier I say especially people like you so that we
can give a demonstration as to what ham radio is all about. I will read
the rest of what you wrote incase I missed something that was of
consequence which is why you should call all your fellow hams what ham
radio is all about plus your contribution to make it move in the way
that you want. To make an impact you must have numbers to be heard.
World Radio will not report the goings on on this newsgroup until we
get the numbers up So please, please call your friends and tell them
about this newsgroup and tell them to start at the beginning of each
thread so they can judge ham radio for themselves. Just loved your
contribution to this thread, we need more people like you on this group
to guide others how they should participate, yours is an excellent
example
Cheers
Art




wrote:
art wrote:
Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade

Art

How can we miss it with the multi-postings? But in order for *you*
to see the charade, I'm afraid a mirror will be needed.
You **** and whine because no one can understand the silly
jibber jabber you throw out...
You **** and whine because no one will try to do or repeat work *you*
should be doing, or already have done.
The solution to your problem is actually very simple, and Dave has
already
given it to you. Build the dang thing and see if it works as you say
on an antenna range.
If it works as you say, *maybe* someone will see a use in it.
If they do, *maybe* you can sell it. Simple. You don't even have to be
born in England to fiqure that one out. A dumbass redneck Texan
like I can see that simple solution in a half second.
If you build it, and it works, maybe they will come.
If you build it and it doesn't work, probably they won't.
To foist among the public a "miracle whip" which you haven't even
taken time to test in the real world is the ultimate charade.
I can make a puter modeling program spit out nearly anything I want
if I caress it in a favorable manner. I imagine others can too. Ask
Cecil about his dipoles that show in excess of 20 dbi.. Sure the
"supergain" can be there *if* you can get power to the antenna with
that super low feedpoint Z. Good luck in the contest trying to achieve
this
task. I bet I could keep up with you using a regular coax fed dipole
and
5 watts power.
You seem to require our permission for you to tinker with this new
miracle whip array. Well, you have my official permission to knock
yourself out.
BTW, why is it that you can't make post without whining about Roy,
Richard, Dave, etc, etc.
I was building a new fangled miracle whip, and they told me it wouldn't

work as planned, I'd tend to listen to them myself. If I had trouble
believing
them, I would build a real antenna instead of arguing about it on
usenet.
If your theory? is correct, it should work as planned. If not.. Well...
Time to conjur up a new miracle whip.
Lurk mode off, and back to those silly boat wrecking rednecks in
Deliverence..
MK