Gaussian law and time varying fields
Good riddance to you Dave you never produced evidence about antennas in
your position in the hit group . You posture about your wide experience
but they are just words. You are a taker not a giver
You ran away when I took up your bluff when you thought your bluster
had succeeded
but you have now been exposed as another self perceived expert who when
challenged
shrivelled away back to your original size as the bloating oozed away.
Fortunately everybody got to see it for themselves and hopefully some
lurkers to share the tail with others Sad, sad ,sad always sad when a
ballon sinks to the ground as the hot air leaks away to leave just a
wrinkled skin
Art
..
Dave wrote:
"art" wrote in message
ups.com...
Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade
the only charade is your rather transparent attempt to draw those on here
into a fight. you'll need some better technical material to do that though.
your other postings about the death of ham radio and its replacement by the
internet make this even more obvious, you never wanted to discuss antennas,
you just wanted to draw someone into an endless discussion of your
bafflegab. the problem is, you didn't have anything good to start with, i
have successfully done that on this news group, but you have to start with
the right lures and enough knowledge to keep it interesting. you
degenerated too quickly to name calling and lost all technical interest, so
good bye and enjoy the new year alone in your thread.
|