RadioBanter - View Single Post

I AmnotGeorgeBush · December 31st 06, 03:43 PM posted to rec.radio.cb

From: (Vinnie*S.)
Yet he had nothing to do with 911, the reason
Bush said we were there in the first place.

He said that after the 100 prior reasons didn't

materialize. Including WOD, Liberation from

Saddam, to have free elections. Did I miss

any?

Yup, you're right! When he couldn't get public support for the invasion,
the reason for invasion changed several times.

The sad part about what you wrote, is that

about 70% of AMericans polled around the

time of his re-election, believed him. Despite

there being overwhelming evidence to the

contrary.

Yea. It sucks that people put such blind faith into the status quo
leadership of this country.

The Dems ****ed up, too. They

didn't seize upon this, and were soft in their

attacks on Bush during the election.

Agreed. They should have hammered this point repeatedly.

I don't want to get into this again. But all this

negativity the people see now, I saw before

we went in.

Thinking back, most of us on this group were against it at the time and
were arguing against attacking Iraq for all the reasons which came to
fruition. There were two or three in here who decided to support Bush at
all cost including attacking Iraq, but as time went by and it became
clear we were quagmired in Iraq (with no clear objective ever defined
and adhered), those folks disappeared.

He had 2 natural enemies over there in Iraq

and Iran. Theu checked each other. He now

has created 2 Irans. ****ing brilliant. What

****es me off most, is I have to deal with

people like my brother-in-law, that think he

has these big balls, and says when the

Democrats win the White House, we'll be

attacked by terrorists every day.

Ain't that a bitch? That's akin to "If we don't fight them there we'll
fight them here." There wasn't anything else Bush could do to make
certain that prophecy was any more self-fulfilling.

But he doesn't want to hear it when I tell him

that Republicans were in charge the last time

we were attacked.

Vinnie S.

Or that the Dems in office at the time who voted for the Iraq invasion
did so at the word of the Repubs which was since found to be nothing but
lies based on forged intel, documents and deliberate disinformation.
What really galls me with Bush is he said the invasion was necessary to
"stop the proliferation or transfer" of WMDS. Meanwhile, for more than a
year, 'lil Kim in N. Korea was not only mocking the US by informiing us
of its nuke progress every step of the way, it actually threatened us on
several occasion while Bush sat back and played whack-a-mole with
Hussein.
I said this before, but if Bush was really a Christian like he claims,
how in the hell can he disagree with the Bible that claims no peace in
the mideast until days of Revelation and Antichrist? He's either a false
Christian, bonafide lunatic or both. That the majority of "Christians"
don't even bother to question this position of his is also troubling.