RadioBanter - View Single Post

Frank Gilliland · December 31st 06, 06:16 PM posted to rec.radio.cb

On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:43:46 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
:

snip
What really galls me with Bush is he said the invasion was necessary to
"stop the proliferation or transfer" of WMDS. Meanwhile, for more than a
year, 'lil Kim in N. Korea was not only mocking the US by informiing us
of its nuke progress every step of the way, it actually threatened us on
several occasion while Bush sat back and played whack-a-mole with
Hussein.

North Korea knows the US won't attack because it would bankrupt half
the western hemisphere just for the humanitarian aid that would be
needed after an attack, let alone reconstruction costs (and associated
Halliburton kickbacks). But they do need to worry about Japan. The US
won't attack Iran either because it would cause a firestorm of hate in
the ME, effectively starting WW3.

I said this before, but if Bush was really a Christian like he claims,
how in the hell can he disagree with the Bible that claims no peace in
the mideast until days of Revelation and Antichrist? He's either a false
Christian, bonafide lunatic or both. That the majority of "Christians"
don't even bother to question this position of his is also troubling.

For starters, I don't think our autistic leader has enough brains to
be running the country. Most likely it's Cheney and Rumsfeld pulling
the strings from behind the curtain -- the Bible's got nothing to do
with it. It's clear now that Iraq was about oil. Saddam was unloading
huge amounts of cheap crude on the market despite the UN sanctions
(and, in many cases, right through the UN). The result was lower crude
prices and lower profits for US-aligned oil companies. Now that the
war has killed oil production in Iraq, the crude prices are up and so
are profits -- at record levels. Between OPEC, Chavez, and the US/UK
consortium, there's no such thing as a free-market economy when it
comes to energy. It's all a sham, just like the "reasons" for invading
Iraq. The Dems have their dirty little fingers in it, too; just look
at how much oil money was spent on Dems in the last election.

And I'm sure Bush was happy with the swift execution of Saddam. Now
that Rumsfeld has been charged with war crimes, he may be tried in
absentia where Saddam could have been called as a witness. That would
have been bad for a whole lot of Republican operatives going all the
way back to the Reagan administration.

But then again, maybe Bush & company are a bunch of kooks that are
actually -trying- to initiate the apocolypse..... ever watch that TV
series "Millenium"? Anyway, the majority of Bush-loving "Christians"
are hypocrites like N3CVJ. Whatever happened to that idiot?