View Single Post
  #59   Report Post  
Old December 31st 06, 11:56 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
[email protected] N2EY@AOL.COM is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Default No More Element 1

wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
From:
on Tues, Dec 19 2006 6:30 pm
wrote:
wrote:
From:
on Sun, Dec 17 2006 3:22 pm
an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
Jim Hampton wrote:

Perhaps now we can discuss N2EY's proposal for a No-Test service.

There was never any such proposal. You are mistaken, in error, and just
plain wrong.

sure there is you have often said

Jim/N2EY was the very first to roll that one out, at least that I am
aware of.

I am not in favor of a "No-Test" amateur radio service. Nor have I ever
advocated such.

Anyone who says I have is mistaken - in error - just plain wrong.

So when you trotted that one out way back when, it really was a
strawman as I described it then. Yet you said it wasn't.

Brian, we have to quit trying to make

admit to doing
wrong.

What "doing wrong" do you mean, Len?

Brian Burke says I came up with a proposal for a "No-Test" amateur
radio service. Yet nobody seems to be able to show us that alleged
proposal.

Brian and Len and Mark aren't the only ones who recall that you came up
with the idea.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e=source&hl=en


Yet *none* of you have actually shown the posting where I allegedly did
this.


Anyone can go into google and delete one of their own postings.


Perhaps - if the person has a google account. But I have not done that.
All my old rrap postings are intact in the archives.

And a person cannot delete the postings of another. So if A post
something, and A is quoted by B, the quote will still show up in B's
posting even if A deletes his post.

That's
why I can't find the posting of Dave Heil/K8MN saying that Veteran's
always have their hands out.


How can you be sure?

Perhaps you did not correctly remember what was actually written.

Your memory of postings here has been proved to be selective and
inaccurate.

For example, recently you made some significant mistakes
in your account of FDR's treatment of veterans during the Great
Depression.

Shall I repost those mistakes of yours and the corrections?

That's because you are mistaken.


Four people are mistaken.


That is correct. The truth is the truth, regardless of how many deny
it.

People sometimes "remember" things that did not happen.


Four people "remember" things which did not happen.


Yep. You're one of them. Deal with it.

Bogart never says "Play it again, Sam" in "Casablanca", yet that
misquote became so popular that it became the title of another film.


If you could *show* where I supposedly came up with - originated - a
proposal for a no-test amateur service, you might be able to prove *me*
to be mistaken.

But so far you've not been able to do that, even though all my posts
are in Google, waiting for you.


Sure they are.


Yes, they are.

That's because you are mistaken. Or maybe even trying to deceive.


Four people are mistaken.


At least that many.

Four people are trying to deceive.


Maybe. I wrote "maybe even trying to deceive".

And you should get your story straight, too. Is it a "no-test" amateur
radio service, or "No Test International"? The claims wander around.