View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old January 6th 07, 08:40 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
Jimmie D Jimmie D is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 296
Default Brian's non-linear linear


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On 6 Jan 2007 06:30:02 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
om:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
What happened to the rest of the post, Brain? Why use two transistors
when you can get the same gain with one? What about your published
non-linear data for your linear amp? What equipment did you use to
make your measurements for real power and harmonic distortion? And
where's that schematic?
Now it's on topic, Brian. Well?



Frank, we've been over this numerous times. Please look throught the
archives.



I found nothing in the archives that explains how your amp is linear
despite your own data proving that it's not.

I found nothing in the archives that explains why you used two
transistors for your amp when it has the gain of only one.


Two transistors in paralell only have the gain as one.
They will put out 3db more power as a single device but only if you supply
3db more drive.


I found nothing in the archives that indicates what equipment you
used, if any, to make your measurements (the same measurements that
prove your amp is non-linear).

I found nothing in the archives that includes, or points to, a
schematic for your amp.

What I -did- find in the archives is you demonstrating that you have
absolutely no clue what you are doing (i.e, "linearity is not required
for SSB...."), ducking the questions by making excuses why you can't
answer them, or pouting in a corner with your passive-agressive "Thank
you for your support" line.

Yet you BEGGED for just one schematic of what I have done. When I
provided it, you once again ducked the questions with even -more-
quacking.

If you won't address the issues then the only conclusion is that you
can't. And just to twist the knife a bit, the equation to find the
minimum surface area of a ground plane is [pi]r^2 where r = 1/4
wavelength.... the area of the circle that is covered by 1/4-wave
radials.

So what will it be, Brian..... a demonstration of your engineering
expertise? Or just more hack-and-quack?