RadioBanter - View Single Post - RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated

[email protected]

wrote:
On 10 Jan 2007 20:56:05 -0800, wrote:

wrote:
On 10 Jan 2007 20:10:12 -0800, wrote:

Katie wrote:

You can't be serious. Why not include you? Because your objectionable and
continually disruptive behaviour preceeds you, Mark. Your record with QRZ is
one indicator, but the other, and worst, is that you were summarily banned
from the very bottom-feeder of groups, the Nim Busters board.

BTW I just noticed this lie I have not been banned from Nimbusters
indeed according to the admin nobody is currectly banned

Your vote and/or comments is just what a new, moderated group does NOT need.
YOU are exactly what a moderated group is, by design, intending to prohibit.

You are solely responsible for your bed of thorns, Mark. Now lay in, accept
it, and stop whining.

Robesin, why do you lie about not posting anonymously?

indeed it may well be Robeson

Sounds like him. Lots of CAPS, use of "summarily" and ordering you to
lay in you "bed of thorns." Sheesh. I think all he learned from the
USMC was the drama from the guys in the campaign hats. Or from
watching too "Stripes" once too often.

yep or full metal jacket or green berets

any coment of the propoasol for moderation BB?

We've gone from Paul talking about this stuff a year ago to "POOF!" a
whole list of moderators and consultants, many of whom I've never heard
of and the others posting very infrequently, complete with a
constitution, articles of incorporation, and rules of enagement.

you have have not heard of most of these folks either?

Nope.

So when did all this happen?

not sure

And wh6hz thinks he gets to vote! Hi, hi!

alegedly even I get to vote but nobody is saying how that works

I see nothing about this being a demoracy.